Archive for the ‘Commercial Finance and Lending’ Category

Triangle ranks high in ‘08 N.C. economic data

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Published: Sep 22, 2009 03:40 AM in The News & Observer

The Triangle may be taking a beating in the recession, but it started its economic slide from an enviable position.Wake County was the most prosperous of the state’s large counties in 2008, according to census data released Monday.

Its median household income of about $65,000 topped the state median income of $46,500 by nearly 40 percent. And fewer than 13 percent of its residents lacked health insurance, compared with nearly 16 percent statewide.

Durham, Orange and Johnston counties were also among the state’s 10 richest counties.

The data included only places with more than 65,000 residents, so more than half the state’s counties and all but 14 towns and cities were excluded.

Among those municipalities, Cary was far and away the richest place in the state.

Top incomes

The swelling suburban town had a median household income of nearly $92,000, almost twice the state’s median income and $35,000 more than its closest competing city, Concord.

And only about 6 percent of Cary’s residents lacked health insurance, compared with about 16 percent statewide.

Neighboring Raleigh, by comparison, had a median income of less than $54,000, and nearly 17 percent of its residents were uninsured.

The Charlotte area ranked fourth on the median-income lists.

The state’s poorest large counties were Robeson, south of Fayetteville, and Wilkes, in the mountains, with household incomes of about $30,000.

Staff researcher David Raynor contributed to this report.

 

kristin.collins@newsobserver .com or 919-829-4881

Spring 2009 RCA Report

Monday, June 29th, 2009

The Next Shoe to Fall Before Recovery

By Lawrence Yun, PhD.,  CHIEF ECONOMIST NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

The commercial real estate landscape is precipitously unraveling.  The delinquency rates on commercial loans are still low by historical standards, but are rising steeply.  The increased defaults, unlike homeowners who could not pay their higher resetting mortgage payments, are often occurring even though payments are being made on a timely basis.  Lenders are labeling loans as ‘nonperforming’ because of a perceived decline in mark-to-market collateral value, and demanding that borrowers come up with cash to cover the short-fall.

The credit crisis has also essentially shut down the issuance of commercial mortgage-backed securities.  With capital so scarce, property purchases have all but dried up.  Investment in  office properties was down 75% in 2008, retail investment fell by a similar amount, while industrial investment fared relatively better … if we can use the term … with a 58% downfall.

On top of the credit-crisis and market-to-market accounting-induced defaults, commercial market fundamentals are turning sharply for the worse.  By 2010, the cumulative job cuts could reach 6 million, which would be roughly equivalent to a situation in which everyone who had a job in Illinois at the start of the recession now found themselves on the unemployment roll.

The national office vacancy rate will jump to 17% by year’s end from 13% in 2008.  The industrial vacancy rate could rise to 13% from the under-10% rate of just two years ago.  The retail sector will also feel the pain of a 14% vacancy rate, up from 9% at the start of the recession.  As a result, rents will fall by 5% to 8% in these property sectors in most metro markets.

The sector that is holding up decently is the multifamily sector.  With home sales at12-year lows and foreclosure rates rising, the demand for rental units has held its ground.  The apartment vacancy rate is expected to stay close to 6% with rent growth to rise by 2% in 2009.

How do we get out of this jam?  First, a massive government stimulus package was already passed in late February.  The $787 billion package, a mix of tax cuts and government spending, is by any measure HUGE.  The efficiency and efficacy of the components are questionable and debatable, but the vast scope of the stimulus package assures that there will be economic turnaround before year’s end.  The economy may even be able to squeak out a gain as early as the third quarter.  That will steadily help on the mob front and on net absorption going into 2010.  Low interest rates and the Federal Reserve pumping liquidity into frozen markets, such as directly buying commercial mortgage-backed securities and small business loans, will also help unclog the credit market.

The baseline forecast, however, is:

·         The economy will pop positive from the fourth quarter;

·         The GDP to expand 1.7 percent in 2010;

·         The unemployment rate, after peaking near 10 percent, will steadily slide down next year;

·         After no rise in consumer price inflation this year, inflation will only rise by 1.2 percent next year;

·         There is little inflation threat – both despite the massive liquidity pump and government spending, and because of continuing excess slack in the economy – which will permit the Fed to keep the rates low through the end of 2010;

·         The 10-year Treasury yield rising to a possible 4 percent by then will not hamper recovery;

·         Cap rates, which had been widening in recent quarters to Treasury, can remain at a comfortable 6-7 percent, thereby preventing property values from collapsing.

A pessimistic turn of events is the debt market’s inability to handle the federal deficit of nearly $2 trillion.  What is China does not buy U.S. debt?  What if inflation pops once the velocity of money picks up?  What if the credit crunch continues despite all government efforts?  The economy, after a short term boost, could easily sag again.  Once that happens, there may not be a public appetite for more government stimulus.  There may not be financial market appetite to take on excessive government debt.  A sagging economy with no further feasible stimulus is a receipt for disaster.  Because of this possibility, in my view, the massive government stimulus package of 2009 is a one-time shot at getting the economy right.

In the optimistic scenario, a strong resurgence of consumer confidence will push the economy to grow at a faster than normal pace, while strong job gains and fewer on the unemployment dole will quickly trim the federal budget deficit.  The stock market could turn markedly higher from a relaxation in mark-to-market accounting, which NAR has been advocating.  Another source of rising consumer confidence will be the end of home price declines.  The home buyer tax credit is an added incentive to jump into the market.  As buyers enter, housing inventory will get trimmed and home prices could stabilize in many parts of the country by the year’s end.  Home price stabilization will mean no further bleeding of bank balance sheets and no further destruction of housing equity.  Banks will lend more and consumers will hit the malls.

On a hopeful note, we are already seeing a rather strong recovery in home sales in the hard hit markets of California, Arizona, Nevada, and Florida.  Buyers are fighting over knocked-down home prices.  It appears that once a few buyers get in on the game, other are following.  Sales are doubling in California with frequent occurrences of multiple biddings.  A tipping point has evidently been achieved,  Will other states follow a similar recovery path?

 

 

 

 

What happens when you sell an exchange property at a loss?

Monday, March 16th, 2009

What happens when you sell an exchange property at a loss? In today’s real estate market, this is a great, and common, question. What does happen if you sell a property, that you bought in a 1031 exchange, at a loss? Let’s say, for example, that you have a buyer with cash in hand offering you $175,000 for a rental property you paid $200,000 for as part of a 1031 exchange you did three years ago?

“Do I have a capital loss of $25,000, and if so, how will that impact my tax return?” I’m currently getting a lot of calls from people with questions similar to this. Most of them are annoyed, and a few just down right mad, to discover that instead of the loss they think they have, they have a gain on the sale.

“How can that be,” you ask? The answer is that when you do a 1031 exchange your basis from the Old Property rolls over to the New. The Old basis is modified slightly if you buy-up, but not if you buy-down. For example, if your Old Property that you just sold for $200,000 has a tax basis of $125,000, and you buy a replacement property for $200,000, your tax basis in the New Property is exactly the same as the Old ($125,000) and you’ve deferred paying tax on the $75,000 gain.

On the other hand, if you buy the New Property for $190,000, you’ve bought-down (which is a taxable event in a 1031 exchange), and you’ll pay tax on the $10,000 buy-down. Your basis on the New Property is still $125,000, your deferred gain is $65,000, and you paid tax on the other $10,000.

The result is slightly different if you buy-up in an exchange. Assume, for example, that you paid $225,000 for the New Property; its basis would be $125,000 plus the buy-up of $25,000 for a new basis of $150,000, and your deferred gain remains unchanged at $75,000. This is how the IRS views it, although you arrive at exactly the same basis amount if you take the purchase price of $225,000 and back off the deferred gain of $75,000.

So, coming back to the purpose of this article, what does happen if you sell the New Property at a loss? If you sell the property for $175,000, and your basis is $125,000, you have a gain of $50,000, and it matter not that you paid $200,000 for the property. The net effect of the transaction is that you had a deferred gain of $75,000 when you did the exchange, but then lost $25,000 of value resulting in a taxable gain of $50,000 when you sold it.

A couple of final thoughts about this whole issue: first, depending upon the amount of your loan on the property, you may realize barely enough cash on the sale to pay the tax. Also, to point out the obvious, you can still do another exchange on this property and avoid paying tax on the gain.

By: Gary Gorman

 

 

 

Sale Leasebacks Becoming More Popular in Commercial Deals.

Monday, February 2nd, 2009

A leaseback is very simple really. Sometimes known as a sale/leaseback or sale and leaseback, it is a transaction wherein the owner of a property sells that property and then leases it back from the buyer. The purpose of the leaseback is to free up the original owner’s capital while allowing the owner to retain possession and use of the property. The type of property involved can be anything from residential or commercial real estate to equipment or vehicles.
Costar’s Randall Drummer reports on how popular these transactions have become. 
“Sale-leasebacks were about 2.2% of all closed transactions by dollar volume in third-quarter 2007, totaling about $2.1 billion. During the same quarter last year, those transactions had doubled as a percentage of total sales volume to 4.4%. In fact, third-quarter 2008 was the strongest of the year for sale-leasebacks and among the strongest on record.   Despite the fourth-quarter meltdown, interest and inquiries about deals remain high.

“Sale leasebacks are still a bright spot in the real estate market right now,” Bruce Westwood-Booth, managing director for Jones Lang LaSalle’s Corporate Capital Markets Group, told CoStar Advisor. “Volume was very strong last year and we had another record year in that area,” said Westwood-Booth, who heads the JLL team that landed last week’s marketing assignment from Burlington Coat Factory to sell and lease back corporate facilities in New Jersey. “Whether we’re just picking up market share or whether our clients are more interested, it’s hard to say. The interest we’re generating from a velocity perspective is almost as good as we were generating a couple years ago. But pricing has been impacted, so we’re also seeing a rise in cap rates.” Other Jones Lang LaSalle executives report that a growing number of corporations are exploring sale leasebacks.

Top 5 Mistakes of Beginning Commercial Investors

Tuesday, November 25th, 2008

My top 5 list of rookie mistakes:

1. Ignoring local market conditions

There are two levels of due diligence required to evaluate a real estate investment–the market and the property. And of the two, local market conditions trump everything else.

A great property in a bad market can be a big loser. A poor property in a great market can be a gold mine. How do you know the difference?

Every market is different, and a deal technique or property type that is profitable in one market it does not mean the same holds true anywhere else.

Analyzing the demographic trends of population growth, income, and employment in the local market will tell you where opportunity lies, or not. It will also show which property types are in demand, or oversupply. Those conditions will make or break your investment.

Investing in an area with declining demographic trends is destined for trouble. So learn your market. Then listen as it tells you how, when, and where to invest.

2. Inadequate property due diligence

The second level of due diligence is the property condition, including physical items such as building systems, environmental matters and structural components. Just as important are the intangible items, such as title, survey, and zoning and land-use regulations.

Knowledge of contract law, insurance, finance, accounting, and tax law is also critical to doing things right at the beginning to insure success at the end.

If you’ve never done it before, this is not a DIY project. The money you think you’ll save by doing it yourself can cost twice as much to fix, and may jeopardize the entire investment.

Red Adair, the famous oil and gas field firefighter, said, “If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur.”

Admit what you don’t know. Approach the property like an open book test. If you don’t know the answer to a question, find an expert who does know to give it to you.

Get accurate estimates from professionals of what it will cost to fix what is wrong. The time spent inspecting the components is minimal and can save thousands of dollars in unexpected repairs.

3. Botching the math

This is not rocket science, but real estate is a numbers game. Value is dependent on net operating income�gross revenue minus operating expenses.

That’s why it is so important to get the real operating numbers, not a projection of potential gross income and estimated expenses.

Confirm and verify every element of income and expense. Value the property based only on present income, not projected income you have to produce.

Your profit is dependent on net income. Net income is the net operating income minus debt service. If you’ve overestimated revenue, underestimated expense, or have too much debt service, your profit will suffer or turn into a loss.

Understand that risk increases with every assumption made. Do not assume you can save expenses by cutting corners or that you can raise rents the day after you take possession.

Anyone who has ever prepared a projection of operations has realized that by tweaking the assumptions, the bottom line can be manipulated into whatever will make the deal work.

The problem comes when it’s time to make the numbers happen. It’s real cash then�your cash�and when the rents don’t go up or the expenses don’t come down as much as the projection called for, you take the hit.

You might tweak the numbers to make it work on paper, but paper won’t pay the bills, and hope is not a plan.

4. Over-leverage

Borrowing too much money in this business is fatal. Highly leveraged deals do happen, but unless it’s backed up by a solid plan with sufficient capital, it can be disastrous.

Using 100% financing for entry level deals is like believing gravity doesn’t exist as you jump off a building. You can argue all you want, but you’re going to hit the ground�the only question is how hard.

The proper use of leverage is a function of deal structure and investment strategy. Every investment property should be evaluated in light of the break-even ratio.

The break-even ratio is equal to the Operating Expenses plus the Debt Service, divided by the Gross Potential Income. [(OpEx + DS)/ GPI = BE]. When break-even exceeds 80%, the structure depends on perfection, and that’s dangerous territory.

5. Failure to have multiple exit strategies

An investment plan incorporates all of the due diligence findings and outlines all the possible outcomes of the investment, best case to worst case.

Ask yourself why you think you can do a better job running this property than the seller did. If you can’t answer that with specifics, you won’t do better, and probably not as well.

Your plan should answer the questions of how the property will be managed; what improvements are needed and their cost; how much money might be made (or lost); how long it will take; how to get out if things go wrong; and how to access the profits when it goes right.

The answers will reveal a realistic plan to maximize value in the shortest possible time with the least possible downside. I rarely have less than three exit strategies, and usually a half dozen or more. I’ve learned that if I don’t have a plan to get my money out of a deal, I will soon be out of money.

Five Facts of 1031 Exchanges

Monday, October 13th, 2008

1. You can buy or sell from anyone you wish.  It does not have to be a swap, but there are regulations on how it is handled.

2. You do not have to buy the exact same type of property. For example, you could exchange an apartment for an industrial building.

3. An exchange does not have to be simultaneous. Taxpayers have the ability to complete an exchange on a delayed basis so long as they purchase replacement property within 180 days of selling their first relinquished property.

4. Simply put, taxpayers can buy replacement properties for a lesser amount and put cash in their pocket, so long as they don’t mind paying some taxes.

5. A qualified intermediary is essential to completing a valid exchange. Basically, the IRS disqualifies any person or entity from acting as an intermediary, if that individual has had an existing business relationship with the taxpayer within the past two years.

Common commercial real estate investment mistakes - don’t go in without representation

Thursday, September 4th, 2008

As the popularity of commercial real estate investing grows in Raleigh, Wake Forest, Durham and the entire U.S., so does the amount of investors who find themselves in the middle of a less than savory deal. As a full service commercial real estate firm, Millridge Real Estate has the combined experience necessary to ensure a smooth acquisition for it’s clients.

From experience, we have noticed some crucial aspects of the acquisition process overlooked by rookie buyers. Here are 5 we find to be common.

1. Ignoring Local Market Conditions

There are two degrees of due diligence called for to evaluate a real estate investment–the market and the property. And of the two, local market conditions top everything else.

A seemingly great property in a poor market can be a big loser to investors. A poor property in a great market can be a gold mine. How can you differentiate?

Analyzing the demographic trends of population growth, income, and employment. This will help you find where the opportunity does or does not lie.. It will also show which property types are in demand, or oversupply. Those conditions will make or break your investment.

2. Detailed evaluation of the property condition

Carefully evaluate physical items such as building systems, environmental matters and structural components. Intangible items, such as title, survey, and zoning and land-use regulations are also very important.

Knowledge of contract law, insurance, finance, accounting, and tax law is also critical to doing things right at the beginning to insure success at the end.

If you’ve never done it before, do not consider something to be a DIY project. The money you think you’ll save by doing it yourself can cost twice as much to fix, and may jeopardize the entire investment. Admit when you don’t know how to do something.

3. Overlooking the numbers

It may not be rocket science, but real estate is a numbers game. Value is dependent on net operating income gross revenue minus operating expenses.

That’s why it is so important to get the real operating numbers, not a projection of potential gross income and estimated expenses.

Confirm and verify every element of income and expense. Value the property based only on present income, not projected income you have to create.

4. Over leveraging yourself

Borrowing too much money in this is fatal. Highly leveraged deals do happen, but unless it’s backed up by a solid plan with sufficient capital, it can be disastrous.

Using 100% financing for entry level deals is like believing gravity doesn’t exist as you jump off a building. You can argue all you want, but you’re going to hit the ground. The only question is how hard.

The proper use of leverage is a function of deal structure and investment strategy. Every investment property should be evaluated in light of the break-even ratio.

5. Lack of multiple exit strategies

An investment plan comprises all of the due diligence determinations and outlines all the possible outcomes of the investment, best to worst case.

Ask yourself why you think you can do a better job running this property than the seller did. If you can’t answer that with specifics, you won’t do better, and probably not as well.

Your plan should answer the questions of how the property will be managed; what improvements are needed and their cost; how much money might be made (or lost); how long it will take; how to get out if things go wrong; and how to access the profits when it goes right.

As you can see, there are multiple ways for a commercial real estate deal to go sour. However, with the right representation and research, you will can hit your investment objectives. Contact Millridge Real Estate today for more insight into this industry.

Mortgage Crunch Hurts Wachovia’s Q2 Earnings

Tuesday, August 5th, 2008

Wachovia, a highly frequented bank by North Carolinians in the Raleigh and Wake Forest area announced some pretty dismal figures for Q2.

Wachovia lost $8.86 billion in the second quarter, and declared plans to leave the wholesale mortgage lending business. The Charlotte, N.C.-based bank is cutting its dividend 87 percent and wiping out 10,750 positions after losses tied to mortgages soared.

The bank added nearly $5.6 billion to its loan loss reserve, because it sees significant deterioration in the housing market. Net charge-offs, loans it doesn’t think are collectable, increased more than eight-fold from a year earlier, driven by higher consumer and commercial real estate losses.

Commercial Borrowers Feel the Squeeze as Bank Belts Tighten

Monday, July 28th, 2008

Borrowers beware: The commercial real estate lending arena compared to a year ago is substantially dryer. Financiers from insurance companies and pension funds to banks want more equity — and they’re not taking the same chances they took just a couple of years ago.

“All the financial institutions, they want to see more equity in a project,”

notes Steve McAllister, president of D. Ansley Co. Inc., which helps borrowers find lending sources from insurance companies to other equity investors.

Twelve to 18 months ago, a commercial office, retail or industrial loan might get done with 15 percent equity. Not today. Now, it’s 25 percent to 45 percent, depending on the lender. Hotel investors need between 40 percent and 50 percent equity, McAllister adds.

Lenders — from life insurance companies to pension funds — are cherry-picking the loans they want to make.

New Hud Secretary Steve Preston Weary of Recently Passed Mortgage Bill

Monday, July 21st, 2008

The housing bill going through Congress that is proposing a 300 billion dollar safety cushion to the mortgage industry and borrowers in distress could have some serious long term effects. New Housing and Urban Development Secretary Steve Preston expressed his concerns today.

Taxpayers could end up absorbing “preventable and foreseeable losses” if the final bill does not include initiatives that the administration has long advocated, Housing and Urban Development Secretary Steve Preston said in a call with reporters.

The legislation, passed by the House and pending in the Senate, would allow distressed borrowers to trade mortgages with rising payments for more affordable FHA loans if their lenders forgive a portion of the debt.

If enacted, the FHA would take on riskier loans than it is used to, which could financially overwhelm the agency if safeguards are not in place, said Preston, who has been secretary for a month.

To that end, the administration is urging Congress to allow the FHA to charge borrowers insurance premiums based on credit risk instead of the one-size-fits-all premiums in place since